Hydro chute News
More Stories from Hydro Chute
How to Specify a Refuse Chute for New-Build HRBs (High-Risk Buildings)
Essential Guidance for Building Safety Managers, Developers, and Specifiers
When designing a new residential high-rise development, refuse disposal systems may not be the most glamorous element - but they are critical. Getting the specification right is essential for long-term safety, hygiene, regulatory compliance, and resident satisfaction.
A properly specified refuse chute system ensures waste is safely conveyed from upper floors to a central collection point, with minimal disruption, reduced manual handling, fewer odours, and enhanced fire safety. In contrast, poor specification can lead to costly retrofits, non-compliance, and persistent resident complaints.
Given that Building Safety Regulator (BSR) approval is mandatory for works in High-Risk Buildings (HRBs), the refuse chute system must be proven to resist fire and smoke ingress. Smoke remains the primary life-safety risk in these buildings, yet many chute systems are inadequately tested for smoke tightness.
Equally, contractors must now demonstrate third-party accredited competency - experience alone no longer suffices.
Below is essential guidance to help you specify a compliant, robust refuse chute system for your new-build project.
--
1. Understand the Fire Safety Requirements
Since the Grenfell tragedy, fire safety in high-rise buildings is under intense scrutiny. Under the Building Safety Act 2022 , the responsibility lies with developers and owners to ensure safety by design. Key Fire-Safety Features to Specify:- Fire-rated hopper doors: Must be durable enough to withstand heavy communal use without compromising fire resistance. Look for signs of robustness - fully seam welded steel is usually more durable than folded steel held together with pop rivets. If a door becomes bent out of shape through use, it is no longer compliant and must be replaced. Fit robust doors to avoid this issue.
- Cold smoke seals AND intumescent seals: These must be fitted to all hopper doors to prevent smoke ingress in the event of fire.
- Relevant fire test standards (in the absence of specific chute testing standards, refer to the following, as prescribed by BRE ):
- BS 476 Part 20 & 22:1987 – Structural integrity under fire
- BS 476 Part 31.1 and BS EN 13501-2:2007 + A1:2009 – Smoke tightness / leakage⚠️ Always request certification from the manufacturer confirming compliance with these standards.
- Fire Closure Plates (FCPs): Automatically closing FCPs at the base of each chute must be impact-resistant. HVAC dampers are not suitable - these are designed for airflow, not falling solids. ➤ Refer to BS 1703 – Refuse Chutes and Hoppers, Section 5.1.2: Closure plates should be 6mm thick to resist debris impact.
--
2. Plan for Access and Maintenance
Refuse chutes are not "fit and forget" systems - they require routine servicing and inspection. Maintenance ensures continued compliance and safety, particularly of fire- and smoke-resistant components. Design should allow safe access to:- Hopper doors on each floor for resident use
- Secure access doors (non-resident) for blockages and inspections
- FCPs and waste recycling units for routine testing and maintenance - without scaffolding or specialist access equipment
--
3. Size the System Correctly
Incorrectly specified chutes lead to frequent blockages and higher maintenance.- A 600mm diameter chute is recommended as a standard for new-builds
- Allow for 900mm floor penetration at each level for ease of access and installation
- Use deceleration bends to reduce refuse impact speed - must be constructed of minimum 3mm stainless steel
- Ensure bends are accessible so they can be maintained or replaced. Install hatches above and below allowing for access for unblocking.
- Guidance on household waste can be found in BS 5906:2005 – Waste Management in buildings- Code Of practice
--
4. Plan for Recycling and Future Waste Regulations
From March 31st, 2026, food waste recycling will be mandatory across all English households. Systems must accommodate this shift. Consider:- Can the building accommodate multiple dedicated chutes (general, recycling, food)? This is the simplest and lowest-maintenance option.
- If limited to one chute, consider an automated chute recycling unit - but confirm:
- Has the deflector been tested for impact resistance (especially in tall buildings)?
- Can the motor/actuator handle the mechanical strain and weight of frequent usage and accumulation of waste deposits between services?
- Can I obtain feedback from a building owner with the equipment I intend to specify? (if you can… DO!)
- Failure to consider these questions may lead to expensive ongoing running costs, repairs and breakdown time.
--
5. Address Acoustic and Odour Control
Noise and odour are the top causes of resident complaints in poorly specified chute systems. Your specification should include:- Fire-resistant acoustic lagging around the chute
- Pre-coated acoustic sections save install time but may offer inferior noise reduction
- Soft-close gas dampers on hopper doors to reduce slamming
- Ensure the soft close mechanism does not compromise the fire integrity of the hopper - confirm no modifications (e.g. drilling) have damaged the hopper, nullifying its fire and smoke testing.
- Self-closing hopper doors are a compliance requirement, but also prevent odour ingress into common areas
- Ventilation/extraction at roof level allows odour to escape, as well as smoke and heat in fire conditions.
- Avoid automated chute cleaning systems - they are ineffective. Instead, schedule regular cleaning using specialist contractors:
- Use high-pressure steam and detergent to remove food waste, grease, and protein build-up, which may also serve as fuel (combustion loading) in fire scenarios
--
6. Work with a Specialist Supplier
Refuse chutes are safety-critical infrastructure. Partnering with an experienced, third-party-certified manufacturer and installer ensures:- Design compliance with fire, smoke, hygiene, and safety standards
- Support with drawings, BIM files, and technical documentation
- Avoidance of costly specification or installation errors

